Poster grades will be based of of low, medium, and high scores in the following categories:
● Technical specifications - 5 points
● Relevance of material - 5 points
● Creativity - 5 points
● Attractiveness - 5 points
● Readability - 5 points
● A catchy title;
● Names of each group member;
● The date;
● Font (besides the works cited) no smaller than 24pt;
● A descriptive summary of your data;
● At least 3 images or figures;
● Key ideas and main take-aways.
● Consistency in participation, every group member contributes something substantial - 5 points
● Organization and preparedness, presentation does not go over 7 mins (no less than 5 mins) - 5 points
● Clarity and relevance of message - 10 points
● Consistency: Did you clearly answer the question of interest?
● Clarity: Can the audience easily understand your analysis process and any sort of conclusions/arguments you make?
● Relevancy: Did you use the appropriate statistical techniques to address your question? Was your analysis thorough (e.g. did you consider interactions in addition to main effects?)?
● Interest: Did you attempt to answer a challenging and interesting question rather than just calculating a lot of descriptive statistics and simple linear regression models?
● Organization: Is your write up and presentation organized in a way that is neat and clear for the audience to understand?
|
Points Possible |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Consistency in participation |
5 |
|
|
|
Organization and preparedness |
5 |
|
|
|
Clarity and relevance |
10 |
|
|
|
Total
points:
|
Points Possible |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Relevance of material |
5 |
|
|
|
Readability |
5 |
|
|
|
Creativity |
5 |
|
|
|
Attractiveness |
5 |
|
|
|
Technical specs |
5 |
|
|
|
Total
points: